SR: The different Nature Portfolio journals are editorially independent. Guest Contributors include Springer Nature staff and authors, industry experts, society partners, and many others. Herewith my comments. quality, format, scientific novelty, language etc). Does this mean that they have already sent it out to the Under Consideration vs. Under Editorial Consideration. What does the typical workflow of a journal look like? Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. The process by which content is created. //--> What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. //--> What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? Share your stories! It probably means nothing. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? quality, format, scientific novelty, language etc). Under Editorial Consideration - Check Status Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Did you find it helpful? 2002 For the status of your submission to [CDATA[> Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Help us to improve this site, send feedback. WebThe manuscript was under review when it was showing 'all reviewers assigned' and when the status changed to 'under consideration' it means that reviews are back with her and The following resource provides insights into manuscript status tracking:, Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses [Handbook]. This means that the editors of the new journal will make their own assessment of the situation. Most Journals have highly automated systems. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. It looks for papers that present an advancement in the field but can be relevant to a niche part of the community. [CDATA[// > Usually, if there is a desk rejection, it happens quite soon, within the first few days. Nature Reviews Physics, specifically, is very keen on technique papers, instrumentations and methodology. Change). WebThe editor is reading your manuscript and figuring out whether or not she wants to send it for peer review. Just want to clarify, that this question is specific to the editorial process of 'Nature Communications' which is not usual and not related to generalized peer review process. Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - reddit PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. They havent decided yet. //--> Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. "Editorial assessment of reviews" can mean that all reviewer send back their reviews and "Manuscript under editorial consideration" could mean that the editor hit the button "look at review". We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Answer: Once a paper is submitted to a journal, it is assigned to a handling editor who conducts an initial screening of the paper to see if it meets the basic Whether or not reviewers have accepted the invitation is usually confidential information available only to journal staff. I think the online submission system is very similar to other journals, so I thought someone might help me to understad this. A guide to understanding journal statuses. Feel free to approach me at a conference or shoot me an email with your idea/paper and I will be happy to provide feedback. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. The editors in attendance were Leslie Sage (LS, Nature), May Chiao and Paul Woods (MC and PW, Nature Astronomy), Iulia Georgescu (IG, Nature Reviews Physics), Stefanie Reichert (SR, Nature Physics), Nilda Oklay-Vincent (NOV, Nature Communications) and Elena Belsole (EB, Communications Physics). Under Editorial Consideration - Check Status The manuscript below has entered the review process. [CDATA[// >